Correct Software Protection – Developers Can Omit Application Piracy

Since applications that execute on Sun’s Java or Microsoft’s .NET environment are less complicated to reverse engineer, one does not need to wonder why there was a steady gain in software cracking. Software plagiarism has reached a global scale for quite a while now. In fact, the protection of the seller’s rights becomes a matter that can not any longer be left alone. Next are a few regrettable computations about cracking.

All outlawed software actions together cost the computer business around $4 till $8 billion monthly, these are crushing numbers. Because of the feel-safe-at-home style of the crime, software piracy is a criminal process that laws as well as technical solutions, fail to prevent. Approximations are that 40 percent of all utilised software programs are pirated. Manifestly, such figures and attitude are crushing. Can something be done? Naturally! Even so, there exist ways that can be utilised by the programmer to prohibit piracy.

Controlling all about protection techniques is a gigantic job for developers, only protection can notbe overlooked. Fortunately, many third party programs or hardware systems for protection do a good task, a welcome solace for security unpracticed developers. At first, the coder should protect program license routines as good as achievable.

Battling piracy is frequently sought by utilisation of a mixed protection system solution. Many software provide a so-called total protection solution, called as such because these tools offer a registration scheme to the protected software. The disadvantage of total protection packages is that if the certification algorithm – that this parcel supplies – is cracked, then all software protected by this total package is in danger. The protection software that protects the creator’s own registration strategy is hence frequently recognised being the solution carrying the least overall danger for hacking.

Distinct from programming in a defending fashion, there is the protector programs who can bring solace. Programmers have also the choice in:

* Online activation servers are reached by programs ‘phoning home’ via internet, so reaching out the licenses only to lawful users. Be aware that numerous clients hate to get faced up with a non-working activation service, with problems due to deficiency of internet availability and with software that sends out additional personal data.

* Demo software incapable of particular characteristics. Clients are transmitted a seperate download link for the full software, frequently it is necessary to uninstall the trial or demo edition before setting up the full edition. Solely a demo edition demonstrating a smaller quantity of features from the full edition is downloadable before purchase. Good protection but the weak point is if hackers find the full edition link, then all is ruined!

Apart from what sellers can and should do to prohibit hacking, there is also a large choice in third party solutions available.

* The software based protectors can be utilised on programs by adding protective code like a stub, this stub can also include more features like e.g. e-commerce. Some have only faint protecting features, others are really powerful. Protectors have seen a comprehensive use in the past and are really standard in the shareware industry.

* Hardware lock: links the software to a specific computer through software (it is software based though its name might make believe otherwise). Priced moderately, hardware lock protectors often fetch good defensive capacities against cracking but the negative point is they necessitate a new certification for the programmer who changes computers. Hardware locking is reached by way of a hardware found number like on a hard disk, graphics card, processor, sound card etc. Remark that hardware locking makes sure that a unique license can not be used on multiple PC’s but is tied to the specific computer it was bought for.

* The most popular hardware based locks are USB Drive Locks and Dongle locks. Despite the disadvantages of these schemes like misplacing of the hardware, missing availability of a port and price which has been rather challenging, both schemes have known some commercial success. A connection for the hardware contribution via a parallel port or a USB port is necessary for activating of the application permission every time. This possibility is advisable in example of really expensive programs or in case only a couple copies are sold each year, because of relatively sound results.

This summarises the most utilised protection techniques and applications that coders can implement to assist in income protection. The choice of external produced products is prolonged but perhaps this overview could bring some lucidity in the subject!

Writer Jose Sogiros is an experienced programmer in the anti cracking software business creating intelligent developer applications to aid bring out more complete 64 bit program anti cracking software.

This entry was posted in Main Tips and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Powered by Yahoo! Answers